Murders are Among Us film commentary. GE

I really enjoyed watching this movie. This movie has a lot of twists and turns that I really liked. This movie has two important main characters. The first main character is Susanna Wallner. She is a very nice young lady retuning from a concentration camp that she was in. She was in the concentration camp for 3-4 years. She returns back from the concentration camp and she finds a Doctor living in her apartment. She came back to help the country and help the rebuild. The other main character is Hans Mertens. Hans was a Doctor who stayed for the war, while Susanna fled. This was common for this time in the war for some people to flee and return to reconstruct the country or we have the people who stayed to fight or aid the country after the war. While Susanna was in a concentration camp, Hans was a Doctor in the war. He saw horrible things, he saw tragedy’s and most importantly he experienced war. Dr. Hans was broken and finished. Inside he was dead.

 

I believe the main message of this movie is to forget the past and focus on the future. Susanna wants to focus on the future and rebuild, Hans can’t forget what he experienced in the past. During the movie and towards the end of the movie they work together for a rebuild. We see Dr. Hans personality change throughout the movie. From becoming a sad and worthless Doctor to becoming a positive and bright Doctor ready to help anyone. From my perspective the message of the movie is to stick together and forget about the past and focus on the future. I know this does not sound easy but it’s what you have to do after a devastating war. To see these two main characters overcome that and change throughout the film is magnificent.

Murders are Among Us film commentary

This movie feels very much like a direct message to the German people. Our two main characters Dr. Hans Mertens and Susanna Wallner fell like they represent two different sides or kinds of German people after the war. All though Susanna was in a concentration camp she like many other Germans who fled the country during the war time return to help with the reconstruction and hope to go back to the way things used to be before the war, a sentiment I assume most people returning home after the war also felt. She wishes to help Hans and the people he represents and directly talks about how they need to move forward and not be tied totally to their past.

Hans however represents the Germans who either stayed or were drafted into the war. He saw horrific tragedy and destruction firsthand and it destroyed him. Its clear he has lost all his hope in humanity and even though he is a doctor fells that he cant help anyone anymore no matter his intentions because he is so broken from the war. He feels like a direct commentary and message to the Germans who like Hans are scared from the war and feels like there is no longer a point to even try and rebuild. However, we see this perspective change as the movie goes on and Hans goes from being a drunk back to becoming a respectable doctor who can help people once again. This feels like the movie is addressing the audience directly and telling them that they too don’t need to drown in the sorrows and mistakes of their past but can and should keep moving forward.

Rome, Open City—A Story of Unlikely Allies

Rome, Open City exemplifies the growing genera of Italian Neorealist filmmaking. Director Roberto Rossellini crafts a story to show the Italian people’s struggle and resistance to the Nazi occupation during the Second World War. Filmed in the year after Rome was liberated, Rossellini used documentary-style shots and long, drawn out takes of dialogue to immerse the audience in the crafted world of Rome in the Nazi occupation. A world in which Rossellini was able to create a united Italy in defiance of Nazi Germany.

Two of the main characters featured in Rome, Open City: Giorgio Manfredi and Don Pietro. The Former is a partisan communist who leads the resistance against the Nazis, and the ladder is a catholic priest that is recruited to help move information and people for the resistance. While apprehensive at first Don Pietro aids the resistance and he and Manfredi eventually grow tor trust and respect one another and are united in their common cause against the German occupation. Outside of Rossellini’s vision of Italy this partnership is very unlikely because in reality the secular communist parties and the Christian democrat parties were often in conflict with one another. In the years leading up to the Fascists rise to power it was the Catholic church’s suspicion of the secular communists that led them to at least tacitly support Mussolini to prevent the communists from taking power. Following the war, the Christian democrats and the socialist/communists parties remained at odds trying to control Italy’s parliament. Rossellini tries to present the embodiments of these ideologies as united and working together towards a better Italy.

Rome, Open City – The Old Italy and the New

priest in antique storeStarting next week, I’ll ask two or three of you to share a short (250 to 400 word) commentary on the film of the week. You can find a full write up on the assignment here. The larger idea is for you to share a perspective on the film, and to give us something to think about before we talk about the film together. Let me share my own comment on Rome, Open City to get the ball rolling…

Roberto Rossellini’s Rome, Open City (1945) opens like a thriller — soldiers in the street, a man hunt, tense music, a rooftop escape — and closes like a national fable — with children marching into the future to build a better Italy. In between we are served up a story of resistance and repression, of suffering and persistence in the face of an oppressive German occupation. The plot is driven by a series of character studies: Pina, who comes across as a force of nature; the reluctant resistance priest Don Pietro, who brings humor and humanity to the film; the compromised Marina, who plays the role of (im)moral exemplar; the Christ-like suffering of Manfredi… It is driven by powerful scenes: the shooting of Pina, the seduction of Marina, the torture of Manfredi, the execution of Don Pietro, and more. And it centers on a number of themes: resistance and betrayal, women’s roles, father figures, moral decisions. Any one of these characters or scenes or themes could be the subject of its own short film commentary.

Italy, of course, has a complicated history when it comes to the Second World War. Italy was the birthplace of the fascist movement, and Mussolini was an ally of Hitler in the effort to dominate Europe and the world. By the time of the “open city” of Rome, in 1943 and 1944, Italy was occupied by the German Army which faced an Allied invasion from the south. For the most part, the moral valences of the characters come in black and white, good and bad, but there are Italians on the bad side (such as the police chief), Axis soldiers on the good side (such as the Austrian deserter). Nonetheless, this is a film about resistance, a film that aims to redeem Italy from the stain of fascism.

We could write another comment centering on the roles of women in the film. Pina stands as a powerful maternal figure. She slaps Marcello around a bit and pulls on his ear, but everything tells us that this is what a good mother in Italy in 1943 should be doing. That she is unmarried and pregnant gets a bit of notice (from Pina herself), but doesn’t seem a problem in the world of the film. Her sister, Lauretta, and her friend, Marina, are another story altogether. Somehow or another Marina has gone bad (in the world of the film) working in a café, entertaining German soldiers, and giving herself over to the Germans for the promise of drugs and goods. Rossellini was playing on old images, the contrast of the holy mother figure and the degraded prostitute and turning them to the moral purpose of a restored Italy.

Another kind of commentary could direct our eye to the mise-en-scene (or the art design). For the most part, the settings of the film are simple and bare. In the background of Pina’s apartment we see a map of Italy. On the wall of Major Berman’s office there is a map of Rome. There are moments of strange, almost expressionist shadows on the wall, as in the shot of Don Pietro in his study. In one scene, the setting and the props stand out as something different. In the first part of the film, having accepted the assignment to help Manfredi and the resistance, the priest Don Pietro enters an antiques shop cluttered with statues and furniture and asks to see Francesco (Pina’s fiancé). What follows is a funny little moment as Don Pietro looks at the statue of San Rocco looking in the direction of a statue of a naked woman. The priest shows his embarrassment and turns the statues away from each other to protect the eyes of San Rocco. Have some modesty, he seems to say. It’s a funny moment that relieves the tension of the partisan mission that Don Pietro has taken on. But it also seems to resonate with the story of the film. Here is an old Italy of statues and trinkets, expressed through the setting of the antiques shop. The new Italy is behind a door and down the stairs; it is the Italy of the partisans who are organizing resistance to the German occupiers. It says something important, on the part of Rossellini, that the Catholic priest and the Communist partisans will work together. Somehow old and new will have to collaborate to rebuild Italy. And so, in the last image of the film, we see the children marching forward as the dome of Saint Peter’s rises behind them. They are off to rebuild Italy on more solid ground.

Welcome to History 209!

This is the course website for History 209: Europe Since 1945: Film & History. Here you will find the syllabus, the course schedule, and much more. We’ll use this space as a blog to comment on films and the news from Europe.

Note that we will also use Moodle to upload assignments, to access readings, and to share the grade book.

Looking forward to getting started!

All the best, gks